I work with Synergy 7.1 (web interface only).
For one of my project, it will be necessary to show the version of all files or a lot of files inside the work area. With the GUI, it's possible to modify the option to see the "project-specific in work area path". But, does it possible to make the same for all files?
Thank you for your help.
Frédéric
I’m conducting a short study to identify what awareness information does the decision maker (Configuration Control Board members) should know/aware while completing some of the tasks below.
Task 1 – Tasks to analyse the proposed change request
Task 2 – Tasks of determining what changes to make
Task 3 – Tasks of assigning of developer(s) to implement a change
Task 4 – Tasks of assigning testers to verify a change
It's been awhile since I posted anything here, it's just that I came across this:
http://code.google.com/edu/tools101/scm.html#0.1_SCM
With Google use being so widespread, and because "Google Code University (GCU) does not require registration and materials are free to use."
Folks, using this resource will pick up the implied SCM "definition" here of the old bugbear of SCM being seen as just Version Control
The number of people who could spell CM, if you took away 24 letters and gave them two tries, yet have no idea as to what CM really is!
Let's see:
A: I'm a CM'er.
B: Really? What do you do?
A: I do builds.
--------
C: I'm a CM'er.
B: Really? What do you do?
C: I track versions of files.
--------
Hiring Manager: What is your speciality?
CM Specialist: I'm a CM Specialist.
Hiring Manager: Sorry. There is no software component to this product.
I recently cloned an existing ENDEVOR type JCL and created a new type PJCL. Except the name of the type and the description I changed nothing in the DEFINE SCL statements.
Now both types seem to share the same "processor group output type", since I didn't changed that literal while defining the new type. This is a pity because it shall be possible, that elements with the same name exist in both types. Of course both types have different source and delta libraries.
I am using the below config spec which will checkout all the elements from the Label LB_REL_1:
element * CHECKEDOUT
element * .../br_rel_1/LATEST
element * LB_REL_1 -mkbranch br_rel_1
But the problem is I am Not able to Add a new element to source control, I am getting error which says No such Label or Branch exists. Then I tried using the below config spec:
element * CHECKEDOUT
element * .../br_rel_1/LATEST
element * LB_REL_1 -mkbranch br_rel_1
element * /main/LATEST
The cli connection(java client) was established in a client machine (Solaris box), but when we invoked the ccm stop command it became unresponsive for hours until we have no choice but to execute ccmdb shutdown.
thanks in advance!
-mark
What would be the Pros and Cons of using CA SCM in this way ?
Is there a better alternative that using CA SCM as a Definitive Software Library ?
Looking for guidance. All information would be appreciated on this topic.
Thanks.
We're going to have to move our VOBs from one location on our server to another larger filesystem on the same computer. (in Linux, though there is a Windows box used for ease of administration)
Will we need to re-register or otherwise mess with our views to point to the right place, or will it be able to 'follow' the move, since it's only on the same computer?
My understanding of the operation is this:
Problem is ccm users opens a text file.
I would like to either save this file somewhere or save its content.
I need to move my current svn repo to a new domain/server.
When I looked through the documentation, 'svnadmin dump' and 'svnadmin load' will do the job for moving a repo to a new server. My question here is what else I need to do/consider when moving to a new "domain".
The current repo is enabled with ldap and needs to work the same fashion after the migration. Any help would much appreciated. Thanks,
Dani
I have been trying to find out if there is a specific order of installation of ClearCase and ClearQuest versions 7.1.2 but haven't had any luck. Does anyone have any hard evidence of ClearCase needing to be installed first, before ClearQuest? This would be on Windows and Unix, if that matters.
CMCrossroads is a TechWell community.
Through conferences, training, consulting, and online resources, TechWell helps you develop and deliver great software every day.